Rule 48’s Six-Month Clock Starts when Prosecution Files Citation

By -

 State v. Man (ICA July 19, 2020)

Background. Robert Man was cited by the police for the offense of accidents involving damage to vehicle or property (HRS § 291C-13) and no motor vehicle insurance (HRS § 431:10C-104) on June 2, 2018. On June 7, 2018, the prosecution filed the citation in the District Court with the Hon. Judge Summer Kupau-Odo presiding thereby initiating the proceedings. Man did not appear at the arraignment and the prosecution continued the case twice before it was dismissed without prejudice.

 

On May 6, 2019, almost a year later, the prosecution filed a complaint averring drunk driving and accidents involving damage to vehicle or property. Man was served with a copy. Man eventually filed a motion to dismiss based on a violation of Hawai'i Rules of Penal Procedure Rule 48 on the grounds that the six-month clock started at the filing of the citation. The District Court granted the motion and dismissed the case with prejudice the prosecution appealed.

 

HRPP Rule 48 Triggered at the Filing of the Citation, not the Complaint. Rule 48 is designed “not only to ensure speedy trial for criminal defendants, . . . but also to relieve congestion in the trial court, to promptly process all cases reaching the courts[,] and to advance the efficiency of the criminal justice process.” State v. Choy Foo, 142 Hawai'i 65, 72, 414 P.3d 117, 124 (2018). HRPP Rule 48 requires dismissal of the charge “if trial is not commenced within six months” from “the filing of the charge.” HRPP Rule 48(b)(1).

 

The ICA rejected the prosecution’s argument that that the filing of the citation did not start the clock. Rules of statutory construction apply to court rules. State v. Carlton, 146 Hawai'i 16, 22, 455 P.3d 356, 362 (2019). The ICA started with the plain language of the words “the filing of the charge.” To “file” means “the submission of a written document.” State v. Visintin, 143 Hawai'i 143, 152, 426 P.3d 367, 376 (2018). The “charge” is a “formal accusation of an offense as a preliminary step to prosecution.” Black’s Law Dictionary (11th ed. 2019). And so the ICA held that the words “filing of the charge” means “the submission to the court clerk of a written document containing a formal accusation of an offense as a preliminary step to prosecution.” The ICA ultimately held that the filing of the citation on June 7, 2018 constituted “the filing of the charge” for purposes of HRPP Rule 48.

 

Dismissal with Prejudice was not an Abuse of Discretion. Upon finding a violation of HRPP Rule 48, the trial court has discretion to dismiss with or without prejudice. HRPP Rule 48(b). Dismissal with or without prejudice requires balancing of the following factors: (1) the seriousness of the offense; (2) the facts and circumstances of the case which led to dismissal; and (3) “the impact of a reprosecution on the administration of [HRPP Rule 48] and on the administration of justice.” State v. Fukuoka, 141 Hawai'i 48, 55-56, 404 P.3d 314, 321 (2017). Prejudice to the defendant may also be considered. Id. at 56, 404 P.3d at 321. Here, the district court weighed all three factors—the first went to the prosecution, but the other two weighed toward the defendant—and found no abuse of discretion.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Judge accidentally strikes the entire expert opinion in a murder trial

By -
  State v. Sylva (HSC December 29, 2023) Background. Kumulipo Sylva was indicted for murder in the second degree after he was arrested for killing Eduardo Cerezo in the bathroom of the Queen Kaahumanu Shopping Center. Sylva raised the insanity defense and three examiners were appointed to determine penal responsibility. All three concluded that Sylva suffered from a physical or mental disease, disorder, or defect. Two out of the three believed he lacked capacity under the insanity defense was not criminally responsible.   At trial, the prosecution presented evidence that Cerezo and Kyle Keoho got on the bus in Pukalani when they saw Sylva on the bus. Cerezo called Sylva a “pussy” and threatened to beat him up. When the bus got to the shopping center, the three of them got off and Sylva challenged Cerezo to a fight. Cerezo said he did not want to fight and Sylva walked away from them.   Cerezo and Keoho went to the bathroom together. Sylva also went into the bathroom with a ca
Read more

HSC overrules a nine-month-old case and goes back to the bright-line rule to determine “custody” in custodial interrogation

By -
  State v. Hewitt (HSC March 15, 2023) Background. Hawai'i County Officer Chandler Nancio and another officer were called to the Kona Community Hospital in the middle of the night to see a possible victim of assault. An unknown man dropped Cyrina Hewitt off at the emergency room. He found Hewitt awake with contusions on her face, her eyes were swollen shut, a laceration was on her ear, and she had a broken breast plate. She was disoriented and “rambling incoherently.” She did not know where she was or why she as in the hospital.   Officer Nancio waited for the nurse to treat her and then asked for her name and birth date. He stayed at her bedside and asked her questions about how she got her injuries. Hewitt at first said she had pink-eye, but then said it was a stye. Then paramedics came by and asked what was going on. The paramedics said that they saw a truck’s taillights sticking out of the bushes on the side of the road.   Sgt. Mekia Rose followed up on the truck and
Read more

Officer’s False Testimony Prompts New Trial Even Though it did not Pertain to the Defendant’s Guilt

By -
State v. Stone (HSC June 15, 2020) Background. Kentaru Stone was charged with promoting a dangerous drug in the third degree. The prosecution provided five Honolulu Police Department reports to the defense in discovery. The lead officer in the police investigation was HPD Officer Douglas Korenic II. The police department also has a “found property policy.” Property recovered after an arrest that does not belong to the arrestee is itemized and listed a “found property” for others to claim. The only found property report here was an iPhone. In the prosecution’s opening statement, the prosecutor said that Officer Korenic approached a man at a picnic table at Ala Moana Beach Park at 3:45 in the morning. He talked to the man “when all of a sudden the defendant makes a arm gesture. He uses his arm and he flicks away a small baggie, which Officer Korenic . . . recognizes this substance to possibly be crystal methamphetamine.” The defense posed an alternative theory. Counsel in her open
Read more